TV fakery: The latest prominent 'no-planer' Charlie Sheen
http://www.defamer.com/hollywood/charlie-sheen/charlie-sheen-talks-911-conspiracy-161961.php
"...There was a feeling, it just didn't look any commercial jetliner I've flown on any time in my life..."
http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2006/3/emw362500.htm&cid=1105351482
"....I saw the south tower hit live, that famous wide shot where it
disappears behind the building and then we see the tremendous fireball."
March 18th, 2006
(*thx to Ron Winn for this finding.)
The alleged '2nd hit'-aircraft in contradictive geographical positions.
A very clear contradiction.
One of many photoshop jobs of alleged photos,
which deceived the so called 'planehuggers'.
Therefore let's concentrate on the VIDEO CLIPS only.
You see:
1) The real 'view'of the pre-positioned camera
2) A real-time vector-keying of uploading the cgi into the empty landscape (software example)
3) The "result" of the fakery, which had still at least 7 seconds to go for the broadcast
W-ABC officially "produced" the first broadcasted "second hit clip",
which premiered on CNN, with a delay of at least 4-7 seconds.
The coordinates of this pre-positioned camera are yet unknown,
same to camera type, and name of these 'cameramen'.
When eyewitness "Winston" yelled on W-ABC, the "building is exploding right now", he didn't refer to any visible aircraft or incoming "UAV" formation.
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/multimedia.day.html
The host even agreed with Witness "Winston".
He argued, that the fuselage was maybe in the building which 'caused that explosion'.
Ironically the host didn't notice by himself, that a monitor showed an incoming black object.
At the same time, this clip which did come from an unknown source, was also shown on CNN, who picked up the feed appx. 10 seconds earlier.
Apparently the studio director of CNN received the order to switch to W-ABC in time.
The host at CNN was better 'prepared' and noticed the object on his screen, though his street reporter also didn't notice any incoming aircraft and therefore supported the report of "Winston" at W-ABC.
That still allows us the following conclusions, of what exactly might have hit the South Tower:
1) nothing flying, purely pre-planted charges
2) cluster of visible UAVs (including weaponized entomopters)
3) cluster of cloaked (invisible) UAVs, maybe combined with pre-planted charges
4) cloaked (invisible) missile
5) visible large missile (one or two)
6) CGI (overpainted) projecting missile (showing a Boeing jet)
7) "UA175"
8) some other large Boeing, possibly modified
Here is a comment of "spooked911", a very constructive 9/11 researcher and -blogger (covertoperations.blogspot.com) on this issue:
"... Because pictures of the south tower "entry" hole show columns knocked
inward, I tend to favor possibilities where some flying object hits the
tower.
Because videos show conflicting plane paths, this suggests to me the flying
object was invisible or only weakly visible (a blur, perhaps only seen from
certain angles).
This basically leaves possibilities 3 and 4-- cluster of cloaked (invisible)
UAVs or a cloaked (invisible) missile. The problem with missiles is how did they
create the wing-scars? This leaves the cloaked UAV idea as the strongest
possibility...."
I'm personally also leaning between 1) or 3) combined with pre-planted charges,
which had the very same impact shape like at North Tower.
Note also, that if a weaponized entomopter (-formation) was used, that would explain why many different sources (and footage) did not include or prove ANY incoming sound (noise from either missile or commercial aircraft).
In this case, an explanation for an incoming missile will be OUTDATED.
Who is behind the W-ABC clip?
W-ABC (also known as "ABC7") is owned by the American Broadcasting Company, Inc.
The Walt Disney Company, which is specialized in "cartoons", owns ABC, Inc.
Let's assume, W-ABC, which showed the very first second hit footage,
used a pre-positioned camera, which filmed 'nothing',
while another team uploaded the CGI-plane, who was the cameraman?
Or was there anyone?
Who was in charge at W-ABC on that morning?
It wasn't the cameraman from Joe Thorres, who was at a different position: http://www.dartcenter.org/articles/books/covering_catastrophe.html
It wasn't cameraman Marty Glembotzy, who was with N.J. Burkett, in front of the Twin Towers:
http://tinyurl.com/jo6hm
He also confirmed, that he "arrived just after the second plane hit and stationed ourselves in front of the AMEX building on West St. just south of Vesey":
http://b-roll.info/rolling/picture.html
It wasn't Donald Di Franco, who got killed on the 110th floor of the north tower.
What did WABC's "Eyewitness News" do?
They covered the tri-state area with 2 helicopters, but got whisked away.
They didn't film any incoming aircraft.
There was a US helicopter (confirmed on WINS Radio) at exactly the same time of second attack nearby the south tower, not rubbered out of the footage in time.
This U.S. helicopter was later supported by 16-18 other helicopters, as seen on 911eyewitness.com.
Which other W-ABC cameraman could have 'filmed' the second hit?
Joe Tesauro? There is no footage of Tesauro from Sep11th. He seems not to have worked in NYC on 9/11.
What does the website of W-ABC reveal?
An cached archive from Sep 17th, 2001 doesn't help at all.
No name of any cameraman mentioned, who might have filmed the second hit for W-ABC.
What about all credits for cameramen on America: A Tribute to Heroes, which used original footage from 9/11?
Zero results. A quick googling reveals that all camera operators, which got involved in this documentary did not film the 'second hit'.
The list includes Rob Balton, Diane Biederbeck, Warren Forman,
John Gillis,
Randy Gomez,
Larry Heider,
Charlie Huntley,
Jay Kulick,
Jeff Muhlstock,
Stephen Murello,
Johnny Pinto,
John Repczynski,
David Rudd,
Irv Waitsman,
Mark Whitman,
Kris Wilson,
Easter Xua
So who filmed the second hit for W-ABC?
Why do we know only two names of post-9/11(!) produced clips,
which included an alleged aircraft (Evan Fairbanks, Scott Myers/NIST)?
As a matter of fact, no cameraman pops up, who's reporting about his own experience, allegedly filming this W-ABC aircraft.
And here are all other screenshots of contradictive 2nd hit clips:
(* see excerpts of footage here, thx to Rosalee Grable)
Check also Rendering Mistakes
|
|
| Powered by Zoomify |