9/11: 16 CGIs which fooled the world

9/11 was April Fool's Day.

As already proven here, it was a helicopter of either military or "journalistic" nature, equipped with a high-tech military camera system ("WESCAM"),
which provided us on Sep11th, 2001 with the only 'live' available footage (*plus 4-7 sec. technical delay) of the second hit.
The helicopter was already pre-positioned, and allegedly filmed a commercial aircraft.

The original footage, unedited, was never provided to the public.
The name of the cameraman is unknown.

The hypothesis is that the high tech multimedia system from WESCAM, filmed an empty landscape, and was upgraded in real time, with a pre-produced, vector-keyed CGI (Computer generated Imagery),
then broadcasted into the feed of W-ABC, as also synched in time to CNN, FOX and other channels.

The question is therefore, why did they fake it?

The answer is oppressed from alleged 9/11 activists, linked to the brainwash machinery of 911truth.org, associated projects and partners, but also related fake oppositions.

Are we naive enough to believe, that this high tech military camera system,
known as WESCAM, was not able to provide us with much better video quality than the one on Sep11th?

As military contractor WESCAM Inc. (now L-3) revealed during 2001 (and since then improved), their quality and equipment was able to work with a "magnification 4-step zoom"!!

WESCAM did also do a much better job with their special effect for the 'hijack/remote control meme' of the 'Lone Gunman'-tv version of 9/11.
This episode, supported by WESCAM operator Mark Hryma predicted the official "plotline"-version of 9/11 to confuse the forthcoming findings of the TV fakery for the "military operation" of 9/11.
This was an episode, which shows a much better commercial aircraft,
which is 'almost' hitting the Twin Towers on March 4, 2001.
The camera system was provided by WESCAM Inc.

WESCAM did the same professional job for Battlefield Earth: A Saga of the Year 3000 (2000), The Truman Show (1998) and Star Trek (1996).

Why not on Sep11th?
Where was the quality? Where was the real gig?

Are we willing to believe, that a pre-positioned camera in a pre-positioned chopper was not able to zoom into the object and receive the same high tech details?

Again, what was the name of the camera operator and who was the pilot?

A professional WESCAM quality should indeed look like this:

(Pre-Sep11th picture of N612UA, also known as "UA175",
officially hitting the South Tower on 9/11)

Instead the "WESCAMmers" presented us this:

Following this media scam, 15 other CGIs (computer generated imagery), pre-produced by different "VR-terror drill teams", then uploaded by unknown high-tech perps, then forwarded to pre-selected TV channels.
(Obsessed with military number codes, the military '9/11 media perps' had possibly produced "19" CGIs, but then trashcanned their worst products, or put some on hold for later.
However the majority of all known 'CGI scams' had not even been presented anyway in the first two hours after the second 'hit' (8:45 AM -10:45 AM).

Many clips never arrived on the day of Sep11th at all, instead in the following weeks overpromoted on the internet.
Evan Fairbanks' "footage" was confiscated by the FBI and all other sources had been unknown, falsely linked to photographers (incl. conflicting credits), who had nothing at all to do with these 'video clips'.

It is more than obvious, that these CGIs are not even based on photorealistic Boeings (as seen above), but they're results of graphic-designed plane symbols.
Here below in the order of best "results".

The CGIs who fooled the world:

I ranked these CGIs into particular sections, starting with 2 possible Scott Myers CGIs (1 of them confirmed).
Myers is closely linked to NIST, which also controlled the investigation of the Twin Tower collapse.

I ranked the W-ABC CGI on 8th place. Please read the notes.

Quality Section 1

Quality Section 2

Quality Section 3

Quality Section 4

(Notes:
I named the best CGIs individually MyersNIST1, MyersNIST3, Hlava1, CNN_amateur
Section 2 includes FairbanksBlue1, CP1, manos and WABC1_mir

For the better perspective i 'mirrored' the W-ABC image (original above)

Section 3 and 4 are not worth to analyse and have obscure or unknown sources:
I named them FOXh (merging 2 frames to recognise it all, also mirrored to the right for better perspective), pax_cnn, NG (National Geographic Channel), GermanTV1.
Section 4 has the worst products: GermanTV2, AQ_2, AQ_Moore, DK_unknown
(AQ stands for Al-Quaeda. In one example another second hit clip showed up some years later, linked to an unknown "Al-Quaeda" source.

Similar post 9/11-qualities are oddly also linked to Michael Moore.
Addendum (04/01) into Category 4: jap_kiti, of japanese unknown source, also "mirrored" into opposite direction, to get a perspective, original here )

WESCAM -We scam!

And these are real video qualities, shot with WESCAM cameras.
I even picked WESCAM satellite photos (!!), to make my point.
Do "W-ABC planehuggers" and "9/11 truthlings" really believe, the sep11th WESCAM camera was worse than their own satellite-product??

Wide, Mid

Narrow, Very Narrow (Spotter)

On Sep11th, 2001, at around 9:03 AM EST, one mouse button fooled the world:

Only a few 9/11 researchers, their growing supporters and Charlie Sheen know better:

TV fakery: The latest prominent 'no-planer' Charlie Sheen

http://www.defamer.com/hollywood/charlie-sheen/charlie-sheen-talks-911-conspiracy-161961.php
"...There was a feeling, it just didn't look any commercial jetliner I've flown on any time in my life..."

http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2006/3/emw362500.htm&cid=1105351482
"....I saw the south tower hit live, that famous wide shot where it disappears behind the building and then we see the tremendous fireball."

The rest decided to support fake realities and is stucked in their own matrix world of lies, contradictions, sloppery, technical ignorance,
lack of understanding and facts or just plain hipocrisy.

They try to distract with 4 irrelevant entities: